Let's start with the actor categories: I was pleasantly surprised to see Jamie Foxx nominated for both Ray and Collateral. I haven't actually seen Ray (I try to see as few Oscar movies prior to the awards as possible...it throws off my predictions), but I did see Collateral, and thought the acting was top notch. It was nice to see Thomas Haden Church and especially Virginia Madsen nominated for Sideways (which is probably my favorite film of the year, although I've seen so few that I'm really not qualified to make that call), although the snubbing of Paul Giamatti is a real shame here. I was a little disappointed to see Annette Bening nominated for Being Julia, not because I dislike Bening by any means, it's just that particular role seemed a little over-dramatic to be a serious contender. Having said all that, the actress category is really interesting this year, with Bening's old rival Hilary Swank back for a second round, Catalina Sandino Moreno and Imelda Staunton both being serious contenders, and then there's the wild card that is Kate Winslet.
For the screenplay awards, I found myself scratching my head over the nomination of Before Sunset for adapted screenplay. Since when did having a separate story credit qualify as adaptation? It's not like this is an adaptation from a printed story...it's a story written specifically for the movie! Oh well, whatever. At least Sideways was nominated for adapted and The Incredibles for original screenplay.
The documentary category shows itself to be forward-thinking for the third year in a row. The days of the World War II documentary being the easy win seem to be behind us, with Tupac: Resurrection and Super Size Me among the nominees. I was actually surprised that Joe Berlinger's Metalica: Some Kind of Monster was overlooked here.
The others: the music categories are downright sad this year, particularly among the nominees for original song...if either Shrek 2 or Shark Tale wins for animated feature I'll lose faith in humanity...hallelujah for the nominations A Very Long Engagement received...visual effects is unusually tough to call this year, as is the makeup category and the costume category is pretty weak as well, with only one real period piece among the lot (and not a very good one at that).
All in all, not a bad list of nominees. Stay tuned for my full picks as we get closer to Oscar night.
Posted by jason at January 26, 2005 11:01 PM
| TrackBack
| Read more: Movies
, The Oscars
I generally don't watch the kinds of films that get a lot of nominations for Oscars, except the occasional soundtrack, special effect, or animation award. This year's been quite different. I've watched The Aviator and Sideways, definitely thought the former was better than the latter, although it wasn't really perfect either.
Since we've both seen it, I thought Sideways was... Well, I'm not the kind of person to call something pretentious, so I guess I'm going to have to go with phony. The people in the movie seemed so real, everything else seemed so phony. I actually live in the Sonoma wine country and, yes, while those huge fields and wide open spaces are very pretty, they get boring because you can't touch it. It's all private property. From the make-out scene in the cellar room you'd never be able to slip into, to the main characters running down a hill (in real life here, you'd probably break or twist something stepping into a gopher hole doing that) then running into a vineyard and admiring the grapes on the vine (again, in real life, tough luck doing that! Those grapes are worth so much you'll never get to touch them.) In between, they play rounds of golf on huge golf courses that seem to stretch into the horizon. It just seems so, well, phony.
The only thing that wasn't phony was the characters' relationships and how they fleshed out, but most the film focuses on the most positively dreadful portion of someone's life, which didn't make for entertaining cinema for me.
Anyway, as I left, I told my friend "I can't believe they went out into central California to film this thing, and what they filmed was hardly even real California. It felt like what a New Yorker thinks California looks like." And then it struck me that everyone I've encountered who considers this one to be film of the year material is from the east coast, with a number from the NYC area. Strike up another, I guess. ;)
Maybe it's just something we don't "get."
Anyway, looking forward to your choices.
at January 27, 2005 04:06 AM
Oh, BTW, I forgot: Cate Blanchett deserves that Supporting Acress award for playing Katherine Hepburn in The Aviator. She pretty much took the film from Leonardo IMO, perfectly capturing that personality trait of being able to discuss several topics at once while talking at a constant pace. The golf scene where Hughes doesn't say more than a few words while Hepburn has an entire one-sided conversation by herself on everything from family to politics just felt dead-on.
at January 27, 2005 04:11 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)